Keitaro's Fitness Plan Exploring Inequalities In Exercise

by Admin 58 views

Introduction

In this article, we delve into a mathematical problem involving Keitaro's fitness routine. Keitaro, an avid fitness enthusiast, enjoys both walking and running as part of his exercise regimen. He walks at a steady pace of 3 miles per hour and runs at a quicker pace of 6 miles per hour. Each month, Keitaro sets a goal to cover a certain distance, aiming for at least 36 miles but not exceeding 90 miles. Our task is to explore the system of inequalities that represents the number of hours he can dedicate to walking, denoted by w, and the number of hours he can spend running, denoted by r, to achieve his fitness aspirations. This exploration will not only help Keitaro plan his workouts effectively but also provide insights into how mathematical models can be used to represent and solve real-world problems related to health and fitness.

Understanding the Problem

Before we dive into the mathematical formulation, let's break down the problem into its core components. The key elements we need to consider are Keitaro's walking speed, which is 3 miles per hour, his running speed, which is 6 miles per hour, and his monthly distance goal, which ranges from 36 to 90 miles. The variables we'll be working with are w, representing the number of hours Keitaro spends walking, and r, representing the number of hours he spends running. The total distance Keitaro covers in a month is the sum of the distance he walks and the distance he runs. Since distance is calculated as speed multiplied by time, the distance Keitaro walks is 3w miles, and the distance he runs is 6r miles. Therefore, the total distance Keitaro covers is 3w + 6r miles. Keitaro's monthly distance goal sets the boundaries for this total distance. He wants to cover at least 36 miles, which means 3w + 6r must be greater than or equal to 36. On the other hand, he doesn't want to exceed 90 miles, so 3w + 6r must be less than or equal to 90. These two conditions form the basis of our system of inequalities.

Setting up the System of Inequalities

Now, let's translate these conditions into a formal system of inequalities. We have two main constraints based on Keitaro's monthly distance goal. The first constraint is that the total distance must be at least 36 miles. This can be written as: 3w + 6r ≥ 36. This inequality represents the minimum distance Keitaro aims to cover each month. The second constraint is that the total distance should not exceed 90 miles. This can be expressed as: 3w + 6r ≤ 90. This inequality sets the upper limit on the distance Keitaro wants to cover. In addition to these distance constraints, we also have to consider the non-negativity constraints. Keitaro cannot spend a negative amount of time walking or running, so we have two more inequalities: w ≥ 0 and r ≥ 0. These inequalities ensure that the number of hours spent walking and running are non-negative. Putting it all together, the system of inequalities that represents Keitaro's workout plan is:

  1. 3w + 6r ≥ 36
  2. 3w + 6r ≤ 90
  3. w ≥ 0
  4. r ≥ 0

This system of inequalities provides a mathematical framework for determining the possible combinations of walking and running hours that allow Keitaro to achieve his fitness goals.

Simplifying the Inequalities

Before we analyze this system further, let's simplify the inequalities to make them easier to work with. We can divide both sides of the first two inequalities by 3, which will reduce the coefficients and make the inequalities more manageable. Dividing the first inequality, 3w + 6r ≥ 36, by 3 gives us: w + 2r ≥ 12**. This simplified inequality represents the minimum requirement for Keitaro's workout routine. Similarly, dividing the second inequality, 3w + 6r ≤ 90, by 3 gives us: w + 2r ≤ 30**. This simplified inequality represents the maximum limit for Keitaro's workout routine. The non-negativity constraints, w ≥ 0 and r ≥ 0, remain the same. So, our simplified system of inequalities is:

  1. w + 2r ≥ 12**
  2. w + 2r ≤ 30**
  3. w ≥ 0
  4. r ≥ 0

These simplified inequalities are mathematically equivalent to the original set but are easier to interpret and analyze. They define a feasible region on a graph, which represents all the possible combinations of walking and running hours that satisfy Keitaro's fitness goals. Understanding this feasible region is crucial for determining the optimal workout plan for Keitaro.

Graphical Representation of the Inequalities

To better understand the possible solutions for Keitaro's workout plan, we can graphically represent the system of inequalities. Each inequality represents a region on the coordinate plane, and the solution set is the intersection of all these regions. Let's start by graphing the first inequality, w + 2r ≥ 12**. To do this, we first graph the corresponding equation, w + 2r = 12. We can find two points on this line by setting w = 0 and solving for r, which gives us (0, 6), and by setting r = 0 and solving for w, which gives us (12, 0). Plotting these points and drawing a line through them gives us the boundary line. Since the inequality is w + 2r ≥ 12, we shade the region above the line, as this region contains points that satisfy the inequality. Next, we graph the second inequality, w + 2r ≤ 30**. The corresponding equation is w + 2r = 30. We can find two points on this line by setting w = 0 and solving for r, which gives us (0, 15), and by setting r = 0 and solving for w, which gives us (30, 0). Plotting these points and drawing a line through them gives us the boundary line. Since the inequality is w + 2r ≤ 30, we shade the region below the line. Now, we consider the non-negativity constraints, w ≥ 0 and r ≥ 0. These inequalities restrict our solution to the first quadrant of the coordinate plane, where both w and r are non-negative. The feasible region is the area where all the shaded regions overlap. This region is a quadrilateral bounded by the lines w + 2r = 12, w + 2r = 30, w = 0, and r = 0. Any point within this region represents a combination of walking and running hours that satisfies Keitaro's monthly fitness goals. The graphical representation provides a visual understanding of the possible workout plans and helps in identifying specific solutions that meet Keitaro's requirements.

Analyzing the Feasible Region

The feasible region, as we've determined graphically, represents all the possible combinations of walking (w) and running (r) hours that satisfy Keitaro's constraints. This region is a quadrilateral, and its vertices are particularly important because they represent the extreme points of the solution set. To find these vertices, we need to determine the points where the boundary lines intersect. The vertices of the feasible region are the solutions to the following systems of equations:

  1. w + 2r = 12 and w = 0
  2. w + 2r = 12 and r = 0
  3. w + 2r = 30 and w = 0
  4. w + 2r = 30 and r = 0

Solving these systems of equations, we find the vertices to be (0, 6), (12, 0), (0, 15), and (30, 0). These vertices represent the following scenarios:

  • (0, 6): Keitaro spends 0 hours walking and 6 hours running.
  • (12, 0): Keitaro spends 12 hours walking and 0 hours running.
  • (0, 15): Keitaro spends 0 hours walking and 15 hours running.
  • (30, 0): Keitaro spends 30 hours walking and 0 hours running.

Any point within the feasible region, or on its boundaries, represents a valid workout plan for Keitaro. For example, the point (6, 3) lies within the feasible region, meaning Keitaro could walk for 6 hours and run for 3 hours and still meet his monthly goals. To verify this, we can plug these values into our simplified inequalities: 6 + 2(3) = 12, which satisfies w + 2r ≥ 12, and 6 + 2(3) = 12, which also satisfies w + 2r ≤ 30. This analysis of the feasible region provides a comprehensive understanding of the possible workout plans that Keitaro can adopt.

Determining Optimal Workout Plans

While the feasible region gives us a range of possible workout plans, Keitaro might be interested in finding the optimal plan based on certain criteria. For example, he might want to minimize the total time spent exercising while still meeting his distance goals, or he might have a preference for walking or running. To determine the optimal plan, we need to define an objective function that represents the quantity Keitaro wants to optimize. Let's consider two possible scenarios:

  1. Minimizing Total Workout Time: If Keitaro wants to minimize the total time spent exercising, our objective function would be T = w + r, where T is the total time in hours. To find the minimum value of T, we can use the method of linear programming. This involves evaluating the objective function at each vertex of the feasible region. The vertex that gives the smallest value of T represents the optimal solution for minimizing workout time.
  2. Maximizing Running Time: If Keitaro enjoys running more than walking and wants to maximize his running time, our objective function would be R = r. In this case, we want to find the vertex of the feasible region with the largest r-value. Evaluating R at each vertex, we can identify the workout plan that maximizes Keitaro's running time.

Let's apply these scenarios to our vertices:

  • For minimizing total workout time (T = w + r):
    • (0, 6): T = 0 + 6 = 6 hours
    • (12, 0): T = 12 + 0 = 12 hours
    • (0, 15): T = 0 + 15 = 15 hours
    • (30, 0): T = 30 + 0 = 30 hours

The minimum workout time is 6 hours, which occurs when Keitaro spends 0 hours walking and 6 hours running.

  • For maximizing running time (R = r):

    • (0, 6): R = 6 hours
    • (12, 0): R = 0 hours
    • (0, 15): R = 15 hours
    • (30, 0): R = 0 hours

    The maximum running time is 15 hours, which occurs when Keitaro spends 0 hours walking and 15 hours running.

These analyses demonstrate how the system of inequalities and the feasible region can be used to determine optimal workout plans based on different objectives. Keitaro can use this information to tailor his fitness routine to his specific goals and preferences.

Real-World Applications and Implications

The mathematical model we've developed for Keitaro's workout plan has broader applications beyond this specific scenario. Systems of inequalities are a powerful tool for modeling real-world constraints and optimizing various outcomes. Here are some examples of how this type of modeling can be used in different contexts:

  1. Resource Allocation: Businesses can use systems of inequalities to optimize the allocation of resources, such as raw materials, labor, and capital. By defining constraints on available resources and setting an objective function to maximize profit or minimize cost, businesses can determine the most efficient way to allocate their resources.
  2. Diet Planning: Nutritionists can use systems of inequalities to create balanced diet plans that meet specific nutritional requirements. Constraints can be set on calorie intake, macronutrient ratios, and vitamin and mineral levels. The objective function might be to minimize calorie intake while meeting all nutritional needs, or to maximize the intake of certain nutrients.
  3. Production Planning: Manufacturers can use systems of inequalities to optimize production schedules. Constraints can be set on production capacity, inventory levels, and demand forecasts. The objective function might be to maximize production output while minimizing costs and meeting customer demand.
  4. Investment Portfolio Optimization: Financial analysts can use systems of inequalities to create investment portfolios that balance risk and return. Constraints can be set on the amount of investment in different asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, and real estate. The objective function might be to maximize return while minimizing risk.

In each of these applications, the key steps are to define the variables, identify the constraints, set up the system of inequalities, and define the objective function. By solving the system of inequalities and optimizing the objective function, decision-makers can find the best course of action to achieve their goals. The Keitaro's workout plan example provides a clear illustration of how these concepts can be applied in a practical setting, highlighting the versatility and importance of mathematical modeling in everyday life.

Conclusion

In this article, we've explored a mathematical problem centered around Keitaro's walking and running routine. We've seen how a system of inequalities can be used to represent the constraints on his workout plan, specifically his monthly distance goals. By setting up the inequalities, simplifying them, and graphically representing the feasible region, we gained a comprehensive understanding of the possible combinations of walking and running hours that meet Keitaro's requirements. We then analyzed the feasible region, identified its vertices, and discussed how to determine optimal workout plans based on different objectives, such as minimizing total workout time or maximizing running time. Furthermore, we highlighted the broader applications of systems of inequalities in various real-world scenarios, including resource allocation, diet planning, production planning, and investment portfolio optimization. This exploration demonstrates the power of mathematical modeling in solving practical problems and making informed decisions. By understanding and applying these concepts, individuals and organizations can optimize their activities and achieve their goals more effectively. Whether it's planning a fitness routine, managing resources, or making investment decisions, the principles of systems of inequalities and optimization provide a valuable framework for success.