Solving 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0 A Step-by-Step Guide

by Admin 62 views

This article delves into the step-by-step solution of the trigonometric equation 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0. We will explore the necessary transformations, substitutions, and considerations to arrive at the final solution set. This comprehensive guide aims to provide a clear understanding of the process involved in solving such complex trigonometric equations.

Understanding the Equation

Before diving into the solution, let's dissect the equation: 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0. This equation combines trigonometric functions (sin x, cos x) with exponential terms (4^sinx) and a square root. The presence of the square root and the denominator (√cosx - 1) introduces restrictions on the possible values of x, which we need to consider during the solving process.

Our primary goal is to isolate the trigonometric functions and simplify the equation to a manageable form. We will achieve this by employing algebraic manipulations, trigonometric identities, and substitution techniques. Pay close attention to the domain restrictions imposed by the square root and the denominator, as these will influence the final solutions.

Step 1: Identifying Domain Restrictions

The first step in solving any equation, especially one involving square roots and denominators, is to identify any restrictions on the domain of the variable. In our case, the equation 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0 has two main restrictions:

  1. The square root: The expression inside the square root, cosx, must be non-negative. Therefore, we require cosx ≥ 0.
  2. The denominator: The denominator, √cosx - 1, cannot be equal to zero. This means √cosx ≠ 1, which implies cosx ≠ 1.

Combining these restrictions, we need to find the values of x for which cosx is positive but not equal to 1. This leads us to the intervals where cosx is positive, excluding the points where cosx = 1. These restrictions are crucial because they eliminate extraneous solutions that might arise during the algebraic manipulation process. Understanding these domain restrictions is fundamental to arriving at the correct and complete solution set.

Step 2: Transforming the Equation

To solve the equation 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0, our initial approach involves clearing the denominator. Multiplying both sides of the equation by (√cosx - 1) gives us:

16sin²x - 4^sinx = 0 *(√cosx - 1)

This simplifies to:

16sin²x - 4^sinx = 0

Now, we can rewrite 16 as 4² and manipulate the equation further:

4²sin²x = 4^sinx

This transformation allows us to see a potential relationship between the terms involving sine. Notice how we've eliminated the complexity of the denominator and focused on a more manageable form. The next step will involve using substitution to further simplify this equation. This algebraic manipulation is a critical step in making the equation solvable.

Step 3: Substitution and Simplification

To further simplify the equation 4²sin²x = 4^sinx, we introduce a substitution. Let's set y = sinx. This substitution transforms the equation into:

16y² = 4^y

This equation now involves an exponential term (4^y) and a quadratic term (16y²). To make it easier to work with, we can rewrite 16 as 4²:

4²y² = 4^y

Taking the square root of both sides can be tricky because we need to consider both positive and negative roots. However, a more strategic approach is to analyze the possible values of y. Since y = sinx, we know that -1 ≤ y ≤ 1. This limited range of y values helps us narrow down potential solutions. Understanding the bounds of the sine function is essential for this step. By using this substitution, we've transitioned from a complex trigonometric equation to a more manageable algebraic one.

Step 4: Solving the Simplified Equation

We now have the equation 16y² = 4^y, where y = sinx and -1 ≤ y ≤ 1. This equation mixes a polynomial term (16y²) with an exponential term (4^y). Solving such equations often involves graphical methods or numerical techniques because there isn't a straightforward algebraic method. However, we can analyze the equation to identify potential solutions.

Let's consider some values within the range -1 ≤ y ≤ 1:

  • If y = 0, the equation becomes 16(0)² = 4⁰, which simplifies to 0 = 1. This is not true, so y = 0 is not a solution.
  • If y = 1/2, the equation becomes 16(1/2)² = 4^(1/2), which simplifies to 16(1/4) = 2, or 4 = 2. This is also not true.

A more careful analysis is needed. We can rewrite the equation as (4y)² = 4^y. Taking the logarithm base 4 of both sides (if we assume both sides are positive) could be an approach, but we must be cautious about the domain. Instead, let's try to see if we can identify any obvious solutions by inspection. For example, if y = 1, then 16(1)² = 4¹, which gives 16 = 4, which is not true.

However, if we reconsider the original transformed equation before the substitution, 4²sin²x = 4^sinx, we might see a direct solution. If sinx = 0, then 4²(0)² = 4⁰, which simplifies to 0 = 1, again not true. If sinx = 1, then 4²(1)² = 4¹, which gives 16 = 4, also not true. But there may be other potential solutions between 0 and 1. This requires a more sophisticated approach, perhaps using numerical methods or graphing. Recognizing the types of equations that might not have simple algebraic solutions is a key step in problem-solving.

Step 5: Graphical or Numerical Solutions (If Necessary)

Since finding an exact algebraic solution for 16y² = 4^y within the range -1 ≤ y ≤ 1 is challenging, we can resort to graphical or numerical methods. Graphically, we would plot two functions: f(y) = 16y² and g(y) = 4^y, and look for the points of intersection within the given range. Numerically, we could use iterative methods like the Newton-Raphson method or binary search to approximate the solution.

However, without advanced tools or software, finding the precise numerical solution is difficult. The graphical method would provide a visual approximation, and we could estimate the y-values where the two graphs intersect. It's important to acknowledge that some equations don't have simple closed-form solutions and require approximation techniques. Understanding when to use numerical or graphical methods is a critical skill in mathematics. For the purpose of this solution, we will assume that there's an approximate solution for y, and we'll denote it as y*. If we were to use a graphical or numerical method, we would find that there are no solutions for this equation within the range -1 <= y <= 1. The graphs of 16y^2 and 4^y do not intersect in this interval.

Step 6: Back-Substitution and Verification

Assuming we had found a solution y* (which, in this case, we haven't), we would back-substitute y* = sinx to get sinx = y*. This equation has solutions if -1 ≤ y* ≤ 1. To find the values of x, we would use the inverse sine function (arcsin) and consider the periodicity of the sine function.

x = arcsin(y*) + 2πk or x = π - arcsin(y*) + 2πk, where k is an integer.

However, remember the domain restrictions we identified in Step 1: cosx ≥ 0 and cosx ≠ 1. We must check each potential solution x to ensure it satisfies these restrictions. This verification step is absolutely crucial because back-substitution can sometimes introduce extraneous solutions. Without a valid y* from Step 5, we cannot proceed with this step in this specific instance.

Step 7: Final Solution and Conclusion

Given that we couldn't find a solution for y in the equation 16y² = 4^y within the relevant range (-1 ≤ y ≤ 1), the original equation 16sin²x - 4^sinx / √cosx - 1 = 0 has no solution. It is essential to emphasize that domain restrictions play a vital role in determining the validity of solutions. In this case, the absence of a valid intersection point in the graphical analysis and the constraints imposed by the trigonometric functions lead us to conclude that the given equation has no solution. Understanding the importance of domain restrictions and the application of graphical/numerical methods are fundamental in solving complex mathematical problems.

In conclusion, solving trigonometric equations often requires a combination of algebraic manipulation, trigonometric identities, and careful consideration of domain restrictions. In this specific example, we systematically addressed the equation but ultimately found that it has no solutions within the defined constraints. This demonstrates the importance of a rigorous approach and the need to verify potential solutions against the original equation's domain.