Solving Absolute Value Inequalities A Step-by-Step Guide To $|x+3|>2$

by Admin 70 views

This article delves into the process of solving the absolute value inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2. We will explore the fundamental concepts behind absolute value inequalities, break down the steps to solve this specific problem, and discuss how to represent the solution graphically. This comprehensive guide aims to provide a clear understanding for students and anyone interested in mastering this essential mathematical concept.

Understanding Absolute Value Inequalities

Before diving into the solution, let's first grasp the core idea of absolute value. The absolute value of a number is its distance from zero on the number line. It is always a non-negative value. For example, ∣3∣=3|3| = 3 and ∣−3∣=3|-3| = 3. This concept is crucial for understanding absolute value inequalities.

An absolute value inequality involves an absolute value expression compared to a constant using inequality symbols such as >, <, ≥, or ≤. The inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2 essentially asks: for what values of x is the distance between x and -3 greater than 2? This is where the concept splits into two separate cases, which we'll explore in detail.

When dealing with absolute value inequalities of the form |expression| > constant, we need to consider two scenarios. First, the expression inside the absolute value can be greater than the constant. Second, the expression inside the absolute value can be less than the negative of the constant. This stems from the definition of absolute value; a number is considered to be far from zero if it is either a large positive number or a large negative number. The key to mastering these inequalities lies in understanding this split and handling each case meticulously. Our focus throughout this guide will be on breaking down these cases and providing a step-by-step method for solving them. By the end of this article, you'll have a solid understanding of how to tackle these problems and interpret the results graphically.

Step-by-Step Solution of ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2

To solve the absolute value inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2, we need to consider two separate cases, as previously mentioned. This separation is the cornerstone of solving any absolute value inequality that uses a 'greater than' (>) or 'greater than or equal to' (≥) symbol. By addressing both possibilities, we ensure that we capture the complete solution set.

Case 1: The expression inside the absolute value is greater than the constant.

In this case, we simply remove the absolute value signs and write the inequality as it is:

x+3>2x + 3 > 2

To isolate x, we subtract 3 from both sides of the inequality:

x+3−3>2−3x + 3 - 3 > 2 - 3

This simplifies to:

x>−1x > -1

This result tells us that all values of x greater than -1 satisfy the original inequality. It's a critical part of our overall solution, representing one side of the range of possible x values.

Case 2: The expression inside the absolute value is less than the negative of the constant.

This is the crucial second part of the solution. We consider the scenario where the expression inside the absolute value is negative and its magnitude is greater than 2. To represent this mathematically, we write:

x+3<−2x + 3 < -2

Again, we isolate x by subtracting 3 from both sides:

x+3−3<−2−3x + 3 - 3 < -2 - 3

This simplifies to:

x<−5x < -5

This result indicates that all values of x less than -5 also satisfy the original inequality. It completes the picture by showing the other side of the range of possible x values. Together with the result from Case 1, we have a comprehensive understanding of the solution.

Combining the results from both cases, we find that the solution to the inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2 is x>−1x > -1 or x<−5x < -5. This 'or' is crucial; it means that x can satisfy either condition, but it doesn't need to satisfy both simultaneously. This distinction is vital when we represent the solution graphically, as we will see in the next section.

Graphical Representation of the Solution

Visualizing the solution on a number line is a powerful way to understand the inequality x<−5x < -5 or x>−1x > -1. The number line provides a clear picture of the range of values that satisfy the condition.

To represent the solution graphically, we draw a number line and mark the critical points, which are -5 and -1 in this case. Since the inequalities are strict (i.e., x<−5x < -5 and x>−1x > -1, not including equality), we use open circles at -5 and -1. An open circle indicates that the point itself is not included in the solution set.

For x<−5x < -5, we shade the region to the left of -5, indicating that all values less than -5 are part of the solution. Similarly, for x>−1x > -1, we shade the region to the right of -1, indicating that all values greater than -1 are part of the solution.

The resulting graph consists of two separate shaded regions extending outwards from -5 and -1. This visual representation clearly shows that the solution set includes all numbers less than -5 or greater than -1. The gap between -5 and -1 visually emphasizes that numbers within this interval do not satisfy the original inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2.

This graphical representation is not just a visual aid; it's an essential tool for verifying the solution. By looking at the graph, we can quickly confirm that any number chosen from the shaded regions will satisfy the original inequality. Conversely, any number chosen from the unshaded region between -5 and -1 will not satisfy the inequality. This visual confirmation strengthens our understanding of the solution and highlights the importance of graphical representation in solving inequalities.

Choosing the Correct Answer

Based on our step-by-step solution and the graphical representation, we can now confidently identify the correct answer. We determined that the solution to the inequality ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2 is x<−5x < -5 or x>−1x > -1. The graph of this solution consists of two distinct regions on the number line: one extending to the left of -5 and the other extending to the right of -1, with open circles at -5 and -1.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. Solution: x<−5x < -5 or x>−1x > -1

This option accurately represents both the algebraic solution and the corresponding graphical representation. Options that present different solutions or graphs can be confidently ruled out based on our detailed analysis.

Conclusion

Solving absolute value inequalities like ∣x+3∣>2|x+3| > 2 involves understanding the fundamental concept of absolute value and applying a systematic approach. By breaking down the problem into two cases, we can solve for the variable and express the solution as a compound inequality. Furthermore, representing the solution graphically provides a visual confirmation and enhances our understanding.

Mastering these techniques not only helps in solving specific problems but also builds a strong foundation for more advanced mathematical concepts. Practice and a clear understanding of the underlying principles are key to success in this area. Remember to always consider both cases when dealing with 'greater than' absolute value inequalities and use the number line to visualize and verify your solutions.