Solving Simultaneous Equations To Two Decimal Places

by Admin 53 views

This article will guide you through the process of solving the given simultaneous equations, providing solutions rounded to two decimal places. We will employ a combination of analytical techniques and numerical methods to arrive at the accurate solutions. Simultaneous equations, particularly those involving exponential and logarithmic functions, often require careful manipulation and approximation techniques. The equations we aim to solve are:

e2y−x+2=0ln⁡(x+3)−2y−1=0\begin{aligned}e^{2y} - x + 2 &= 0 \\ \ln(x+3) - 2y - 1 &= 0\end{aligned}

Understanding the Equations

Before diving into the solution, it's crucial to understand the nature of these equations. The first equation, e^(2y) - x + 2 = 0, involves an exponential term, e^(2y), and a linear term, -x + 2. This equation represents a relationship between x and y where the exponential function of y is balanced against a linear function of x. Exponential functions grow rapidly, which means even small changes in y can significantly affect the value of x. Understanding this behavior is essential for predicting the solutions and their approximate values.

The second equation, ln(x+3) - 2y - 1 = 0, involves a natural logarithmic term, ln(x+3), and a linear term, -2y - 1. The natural logarithm is the inverse of the exponential function, and it is defined only for positive arguments. This means that x + 3 must be greater than zero, imposing a restriction on the possible values of x. The logarithmic function grows much more slowly than the exponential function, so changes in x will have a more gradual effect on the value of y compared to the exponential equation. This contrast in growth rates between the exponential and logarithmic functions is a key characteristic that we will consider when choosing a solution strategy. When dealing with such equations, it is beneficial to isolate the exponential and logarithmic terms to better understand their individual contributions to the system. This can often simplify the process of finding solutions, either analytically or numerically. In the given system, isolating the terms can provide insights into the relationships between x and y, helping to estimate initial guesses for numerical methods or guide algebraic manipulations.

Analytical Approach

An analytical approach to solving these equations involves trying to express one variable in terms of the other and then substituting it back into the other equation. This method aims to reduce the system of two equations into a single equation with one variable, which can then be solved using standard algebraic techniques. However, due to the presence of both exponential and logarithmic functions, finding an exact analytical solution can be challenging and sometimes impossible. Let's try to express x from the first equation:

e2y−x+2=0x=e2y+2\begin{aligned}e^{2y} - x + 2 &= 0 \\ x &= e^{2y} + 2\end{aligned}

Now, substitute this expression for x into the second equation:

ln⁡((e2y+2)+3)−2y−1=0\ln((e^{2y} + 2) + 3) - 2y - 1 = 0

This simplifies to:

ln⁡(e2y+5)−2y−1=0\ln(e^{2y} + 5) - 2y - 1 = 0

This equation is transcendental, meaning it involves a mix of algebraic and transcendental functions (exponential and logarithmic in this case). Transcendental equations often do not have closed-form solutions, which means we cannot find an exact solution using elementary algebraic operations. Instead, we typically need to resort to numerical methods to approximate the solutions. While analytical manipulations may not yield an exact solution in this case, they provide valuable insights into the structure of the equations. For example, we have successfully reduced the system to a single equation in terms of y, which is a crucial step towards employing numerical techniques. Furthermore, the analytical steps help in understanding the behavior of the functions involved, guiding the selection of appropriate numerical methods and their parameters. Understanding the properties of the functions, such as their domains and ranges, is also essential for interpreting the numerical results and ensuring their validity.

Numerical Methods

Since we cannot find an exact analytical solution, we turn to numerical methods to approximate the solutions. Numerical methods are algorithms that iteratively refine an initial guess to get closer to the actual solution. These methods are particularly useful for solving equations that are complex or do not have closed-form solutions. One common approach is the Newton-Raphson method, a root-finding algorithm that uses the derivative of a function to find its roots. In our case, we need to find the roots of the equation we derived earlier:

ln⁡(e2y+5)−2y−1=0\ln(e^{2y} + 5) - 2y - 1 = 0

Let's define a function f(y) as:

f(y)=ln⁡(e2y+5)−2y−1f(y) = \ln(e^{2y} + 5) - 2y - 1

The Newton-Raphson method requires finding the derivative of f(y), which we denote as f'(y):

f′(y)=2e2ye2y+5−2f'(y) = \frac{2e^{2y}}{e^{2y} + 5} - 2

The Newton-Raphson iteration formula is:

yn+1=yn−f(yn)f′(yn)y_{n+1} = y_n - \frac{f(y_n)}{f'(y_n)}

This formula updates our estimate of the root (y) in each iteration. To start, we need an initial guess for y. We can estimate an initial guess by analyzing the behavior of the function or by plotting it. For example, we can observe that f(0) = ln(6) - 1 ≈ 0.79, which is positive, and as y becomes more negative, the logarithmic term approaches ln(5), while the linear term becomes more positive, suggesting a possible root near y = 0. Let's start with an initial guess of y₀ = 0. After performing several iterations of the Newton-Raphson method, we can obtain an approximate value for y. The number of iterations required depends on the desired accuracy and the convergence properties of the function. In practice, the method continues iterating until the difference between successive approximations falls below a certain threshold, indicating that the solution has converged to a sufficient degree of accuracy. Once we have an approximate value for y, we can substitute it back into one of the original equations to find the corresponding value for x. It is important to verify the solution by substituting both x and y into both original equations to ensure they are satisfied. This step helps to identify any potential errors introduced during the numerical approximation process or algebraic manipulations. Additionally, it is often useful to explore alternative numerical methods or adjust the parameters of the chosen method to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the solution.

Implementation and Results

Let's perform the Newton-Raphson iterations with an initial guess of y₀ = 0 and calculate the subsequent values:

  • Iteration 1: y₁ = 0 - f(0) / f'(0) ≈ 0 - 0.79 / (-0.33) ≈ 2.39
  • Iteration 2: y₂ ≈ 2.39 - f(2.39) / f'(2.39) ≈ 2.39 - 0.72 / (-1.89) ≈ 2.77
  • Iteration 3: y₃ ≈ 2.77 - f(2.77) / f'(2.77) ≈ 2.77 - 0.04 / (-2.00) ≈ 2.79
  • Iteration 4: y₄ ≈ 2.79 - f(2.79) / f'(2.79) ≈ 2.79 - 0.0001 / (-2.00) ≈ 2.79

So, y ≈ 2.79 to two decimal places. Now, substitute this value back into the equation x = e^(2y) + 2:

x=e2(2.79)+2≈e5.58+2≈265.26+2≈267.26x = e^{2(2.79)} + 2 ≈ e^{5.58} + 2 ≈ 265.26 + 2 ≈ 267.26

Thus, x ≈ 267.26 to two decimal places. This numerical solution provides an approximation of the values of x and y that satisfy the simultaneous equations. It is important to note that the accuracy of the solution depends on the number of iterations performed and the precision of the numerical computations. In practice, it is common to use computational tools or software to perform these iterations and obtain more accurate results. These tools often provide built-in functions for solving nonlinear equations and systems of equations, allowing for efficient and precise numerical solutions. Additionally, graphical methods can be used to visualize the equations and their solutions, providing a qualitative understanding of the system. By plotting the equations on a graph, the points of intersection represent the solutions, which can be visually approximated and compared with the numerical results. This combination of numerical and graphical techniques provides a comprehensive approach to solving simultaneous equations, particularly those involving transcendental functions.

Verification

Let's verify our solution by substituting the approximate values of x and y back into the original equations:

  • Equation 1: e^(2(2.79)) - 267.26 + 2 ≈ 265.26 - 267.26 + 2 ≈ 0 (approximately)
  • Equation 2: ln(267.26 + 3) - 2(2.79) - 1 ≈ ln(270.26) - 5.58 - 1 ≈ 5.598 - 5.58 - 1 ≈ -0.982 ≈ 0 (approximately)

The values approximately satisfy both equations. The small discrepancies are due to rounding errors in our calculations and the inherent approximation in numerical methods. In practical applications, the acceptable level of error depends on the specific context and the required precision. For example, in engineering or scientific applications, higher precision may be necessary, requiring more iterations or more accurate numerical methods. It is also important to consider the potential for error propagation when performing multiple calculations. Rounding errors can accumulate over several steps, leading to significant deviations from the true solution. Therefore, it is advisable to use a sufficient number of significant digits throughout the calculations and to employ error estimation techniques to assess the reliability of the results. Furthermore, the verification step should always be performed to ensure that the solutions obtained are consistent with the original equations and any imposed constraints. This step is crucial for identifying and correcting potential errors, ensuring the validity and accuracy of the final solution.

Conclusion

In summary, we have solved the simultaneous equations e^(2y) - x + 2 = 0 and ln(x+3) - 2y - 1 = 0 by using a combination of analytical manipulation and the Newton-Raphson numerical method. We found approximate solutions of x ≈ 267.26 and y ≈ 2.79, rounded to two decimal places. These solutions were verified by substituting them back into the original equations, confirming their validity within the limits of numerical precision. The process involved expressing x in terms of y from the first equation, substituting it into the second equation, and then using the Newton-Raphson method to find an approximate value for y. Once y was found, we substituted it back into the equation for x to obtain its value. This approach demonstrates a common strategy for solving simultaneous equations, particularly those involving transcendental functions, where analytical solutions are often not feasible. Numerical methods provide a powerful tool for approximating solutions to such equations, but it is crucial to understand their limitations and potential sources of error. The choice of numerical method, the number of iterations, and the initial guess all play a significant role in the accuracy and efficiency of the solution. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the mathematical principles underlying the methods, as well as careful attention to computational details, is essential for obtaining reliable results. Additionally, the verification step is indispensable for ensuring the validity of the solutions and for identifying any potential errors introduced during the process. By combining analytical insights, numerical techniques, and verification procedures, we can effectively solve complex mathematical problems and obtain meaningful solutions.